Number of the Beast
American Bar Association
Is the Social Security Number (SSN) just a number to identify Americans or is it the number of the Mark of the Beast? (Or is this just a bad joke by bad lawyers?)
Revelations Chapter 13 speaks of a beast who “forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man’s number. His number is 666.”
Title 42, Section 666
Title 42, Section 666, paragraph “13” of the United States Code (USC) requires that as a condition to receiving federal funds States must establish procedures requiring that the social security number (SSN) of any applicant for a professional license, driver’s license, recreational license, occupational license, or marriage license be recorded on the application.
Also, if you assign the number value of each letter in the word “Title” relative to how each number appears in the alphabet, these five numbers add up to 66. 4 + 2 equals 6. Therefore, Title 42 adds up to 666 in numerology, completing a second “666” in front of “Section 666”. The odds of this occurring “by coincidence” are astronomical. The fact that these numbers are being used to restrict and control basic human rights that one needs to survive is further evidence that this is not just a coincidence.
This SSN requirement occurred in 1996 when Title 42, Section 666, paragraph 13 was amended by Section 317 of the “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996” (Public Law 104-193). The intent was to make this uniform throughout all the States. Can you guess who was behind this?
If you guessed “lawyers”, you are right on the mark. Did not Congress pass these laws and isn’t the most prevalent profession in Congress lawyers, i.e., members of the “Bar Association“? Also, when the so-called “Patriot Act” was passed by Congress, none of the congressmen actually read the bill! The Orwellian Patriot Act and Real ID Act were both introduced by lawyer/politician Jim Sensenbrenner. According to Sensenbrenner’s Wikipedia page, one the authors of the Patriot Act was “Assistant Attorney General of the United States Viet Dinh” (i.e., another lawyer).
Section 321 of Public Law 104-193 (which amended aforementioned Section 666, paragraph 13) states:
“SEC. 321. ADOPTION OF UNIFORM STATE LAWS.
“Section 466 (42 U.S.C. 666) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“`(f) UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT – In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), on and after January 1, 1998, each State must have in effect the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, as approved by the American Bar Association on February 9, 1993, together with any amendments officially adopted before January 1, 1998 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.’.”
The question we should be asking ourselves is: Why does each State have to get the approval of the “American Bar Association“? The American Bar Association is not a government entity! Here again is a documented example of the violation of the separation of powers doctrine–that is, tyranny. The “Father of the Constitution”, James Madison, stated in the Federalist Papers: “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
Most people do not believe that the Social Security Number is the Mark of the Beast, but until you actually revoke it and try to survive without that number, you will never realize how much your survival depends upon it.
Even though there is no constitutional provision for a social security number, Americans can no longer get a bank account to conduct their business without a social security number. You cannot get a credit card without a Social Security Number. You cannot get a professional or occupational license to make a living without a social security number. No one will hire you as an employee if you do not have a social security number. Even if you have a job or business, how are you going to get to work without a driver’s license (unless you happen to live in a city with public transportation)? You can be imprisoned for not having a driver’s license. You cannot get insurance without a social security number. You cannot get a hunting or fishing license without a social security number. You cannot get a marriage license without a social security number. How are you going to buy a home or car unless you have the cash or credit? The bottom line is that you cannot buy or sell (that is, survive financially) without a Social Security Number unless somebody with a Social Security Number is providing for you by buying your food, clothing, shelter and all the things you need to survive.
Although there is no law that forces people to obtain a SSN (the 13th Amendment prohibits slavery and “involuntary servitude”), once you get a SSN, you will be stuck with it for the rest of your life because the Social Security Administration will never rescind it. Also, if someone with a SSN is providing your worldly needs, they cannot deduct you as a dependent unless you have a SSN. For more info about this subject visit this web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ssn.htm.
Here are few more important facts about the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS):
1. The Social Security Administration is not authorized by the United States Constitution and therefore is unconstitutional.
2. The Social Security Administration is not even located in Washington D.C., the constitutional seat of the “federal” government. The SSA is located in Baltimore, Maryland.
3. The Social Security Administration does not even have franking privileges. That is, they have to pay for their own postage on their mailings. Since the US Post Office is authorized by the Constitution, there is no need for federal entities to purchase postage when conducting “official business”. If the SSA were a legitimate entity under the Constitution it would have franking privileges, but it does not.
4. The Social Security system is broke: http://www.ronpaulforcongress.com/html/social_security.html.
5. According to a form letter sent from the Social Security Administration in Baltimore, Maryland, the IRS has jurisdiction over the SSA.
6. The IRS is not an agency of the US government according to official court documents filed by the US Attorney in the following case in Idaho: http://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX08.002.pdf.
Given 1) that the IRS has jurisdiction over the Social Security Administration and 2) that the IRS is not an agency of the US government, the next question we should all be asking is where do people’s payments to the IRS go? To answer that question correctly one must determine what is being paid to the IRS–that is, Federal Reserve Notes (or “checks” denominated in Federal Reserve Note “dollars”). According to Black’s Law Dictionary, the definition of money cannot include “notes”. A note is a promise to pay or “IOU” and is not “payment” in itself. Federal Reserve Notes are not money. According to the US Constitution, the only currency that can pay debts is silver and gold coin. Federal Reserve notes (i.e., “bills of credit”) are prohibited by the Constitution.
What we do know is that the checks that people send to the IRS are cashed by large banks in the Federal Reserve system, such as “Bank of America”. Sometimes the back of cancelled checks list a large bank then state: “or pay to the nearest FRB”. “FRB” stands for Federal Reserve Bank. Since the Federal Reserve is a secretive, privately-controlled banking cartel, We the People are apparently not allowed to know where these “notes” end up. It is doubtful that these “notes” ever reach the United States Department of the Treasury. It appears that they end up at the Federal Reserve to be applied as interest to the national debt to these banksters. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was unconstitutional from the start because Congress cannot lawfully amend the US Constitution with a mere statute.
During the Constitutional Convention the delegates used the words “emit bills of credit” to refer to the issuance of paper (debt-based) currency. The framers of the Constitution were so adamant about prohibiting the printing of paper currency that one of the delegates, George Reed of Delaware, exclaimed that if they put the words “emit bills of credit” in the Constitution it would be “as alarming as the mark of the beast in Revelation!”
There are some people who will argue that the Mark of the Beast is a microchip implant and that they haven’t accepted this implant, therefore they haven’t accepted the mark. Today some people have accepted biochip implants in their hand or wrist and some governments are gradually mandating them in certain circumstances. However, virtually every adult who has a Social Security “Number” has memorized it and therefore some argue that the number is lodged in their forehead (brain).
Of course, there is the possibility that these unconstitutional laws are simply a result of a weird sense of humor on the part of the Bar Association lawyers who wrote these laws. Another possibility is that these lawyers (or the people behind the lawyers) were creating a means to control group thought. According to one pro-Rockefeller book, David Rockefeller and his attorney, CIA Director Allen Dulles, met after church on Sundays to discuss how they could control religious thinking.
There is currently a great interview on Google Video of Aaron Russo, the producer/director of the movie “Freedom to Fascism”. In this interview Mr. Russo describes his friendship with Nick Rockefeller who through time revealed to him that their plan was to control society by creating a cashless society and “chipping” everyone. To watch this video click on this link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918&q=aaron+russo+interview